Risk Preference, Health Risk Perception, and Environmental Exposure Nexus: Evidence from Rural Women as Pig Breeders, China

• Published in: Social indicators research Vol. 162; no. 1; pp. 151 - 178
• Main Authors: Si, Ruishi, Zhang, Xueqian, Yao, Yumeng, Lu, Qian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.07.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Agricultural economics; Asian cultural groups; Developing countries; Females; Health risk assessment; Health risks; Heterogeneity; Human Geography; LDCs; Least Squares Statistics; Livestock breeding; Microeconomics; Original Research; Policy making; Pollution; Preferences; Public Health; Quality of Life Research; Risk perception; Rural communities; Self evaluation; Social Sciences; Sociology; Women; Health risk perception; Environmental exposure; Risk preference; Experimental economics; Women breeders; 2SLS
• ISSN: 0303-8300; 1573-0921
• DOI: 10.1007/s11205-021-02837-x

Rural women are an integral part of the agricultural economy. Still, their exposure to environmental pollution, especially in the context of risk preference and health risk perception, has not gained much attention in the existing literature. So to explore this notion, a survey and experimental data of 714 rural Chinese women as pig breeders are taken, we innovatively evaluate the degree of environmental exposure from the pre-exposure, in-exposure, post-exposure intervention of women breeders, and two-stage least squares (2SLS) method is employed to address the endogeneity issue between health risk perception and environmental exposure. The results show that rural women breeders suffer from severe environmental exposure, and the degree of environmental exposure is up to 72.102( Min  = 0, Max  = 100). Risk preference also emerges as a crucial determinant behind their environmental exposure, but health risk perception significantly deters the degree of environmental exposure. The health risk perception can offset risk preference effects on women breeders’ environmental exposure by 15.15%. Moreover, considering the heterogeneity of the breeding scale, it is found that the impact of risk preference and health risk perception on women breeders’ environmental exposure is an inverted U-shaped relationship, i.e., the results are at the turning stage when the breeding scale is 31–40 heads. Based on the empirical findings, the study offers guidelines for policymakers to enhance awareness amongst women breeders regarding health and pollution and encourage them to opt for environment-friendly breeding. Moreover, this research also has substantial guiding significance for related research on environmental exposure of rural women in other developing countries.