Single‐Subject Network Analysis of FDOPA PET in Parkinson's Disease and Psychosis Spectrum

ABSTRACT Greater understanding of individual biological differences is essential for developing more targeted treatment approaches to complex brain disorders. Traditional analysis methods in molecular imaging studies have primarily focused on quantifying tracer binding in specific brain regions, oft...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHUMAN BRAIN MAPPING Vol. 46; no. 8; pp. e70253 - n/a
Main Authors Severino, Mario, Schubert, Julia J., Nordio, Giovanna, Giacomel, Alessio, Easmin, Rubaida, Lao‐Kaim, Nick P., Selvaggi, Pierluigi, Xu, Zhilei, Pereira, Joana B., Jauhar, Sameer, Piccini, Paola, Howes, Oliver, Turkheimer, Federico, Veronese, Mattia, Angelescu, Ilinca, Bloomfield, Micheal, Bonoldi, Ilaria, Borgan, Faith, Dahoun, Tarik, Enrico, D’Ambrosio, Demjaha, Arsime, Donocik, Jecek, Egerton, Alice, Kaar, Stephen, Kim, Euitae, Kim, Seoyoung, Maccabe, James, Matthews, Julian, McCutcheon, Robert, McGuire, Philip, Nosarti, Chiara, Nour, Matthew M., Rogdaki, Maria, Rutigliano, Grazia, Shatalina, Ekaterina, Talbot, Peter S, Vano, Luke
Format Journal Article Publication
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.06.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Greater understanding of individual biological differences is essential for developing more targeted treatment approaches to complex brain disorders. Traditional analysis methods in molecular imaging studies have primarily focused on quantifying tracer binding in specific brain regions, often neglecting inter‐regional functional relationships. In this study, we propose a statistical framework that combines molecular imaging data with perturbation covariance analysis to construct single‐subject networks and investigate individual patterns of molecular alterations. This framework was tested on [18F]‐DOPA PET imaging as a marker of the brain dopamine system in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) and schizophrenia to evaluate its ability to classify patients and characterize their disease severity. Our results show that single‐subject networks effectively capture molecular alterations, differentiate individuals with heterogeneous conditions, and account for within‐group variability. Moreover, the approach successfully distinguishes between preclinical and clinical stages of psychosis and identifies the corresponding molecular connectivity changes in response to antipsychotic medications. Mapping molecular imaging networks presents a new and powerful method for characterizing individualized disease trajectories as well as for evaluating treatment effectiveness in future research. We propose a statistical framework combining molecular imaging and perturbation covariance analysis to build single‐subject networks, identifying molecular alterations in brain disorders. This method tests whether it can characterize altered molecular patterns and distinguish disorders through classification.
Bibliography:The members of FDOPA PET Imaging Working Group Consortium are listed in
section.
Funding
Aknowledgment
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Funding: The members of FDOPA PET Imaging Working Group Consortium are listed in Aknowledgment section.
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.70253