The acquisition of scientific knowledge: the influence of methods of questioning and analysis on the interpretation of children's conceptions of the earth

Studies of children's knowledge of the Earth have led to very different conclusions: some appear to show that children construct their own, non‐scientific ‘theories’ (mental models) of the flat, hollow or dual Earth. Others indicate that many young children have some understanding of the spheri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInfant and child development Vol. 20; no. 6; pp. 432 - 448
Main Authors Frède, Valérie, Nobes, Gavin, Frappart, Sören, Panagiotaki, Georgia, Troadec, Bertrand, Martin, Alan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.11.2011
Wiley-Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Studies of children's knowledge of the Earth have led to very different conclusions: some appear to show that children construct their own, non‐scientific ‘theories’ (mental models) of the flat, hollow or dual Earth. Others indicate that many young children have some understanding of the spherical (scientific) Earth, and that their knowledge lacks the coherence of mental models. The reasons for these contrasting views were tested by interviewing French children (N = 178) aged 5–11 years and varying the different methods used in previous research, namely the types of questions (open and forced‐choice), the form of representation (two‐dimensional pictures and three‐dimensional models), and the method of analysis (the mental model theorists' coding scheme and a statistical test for associations using MANOVA). Forced‐choice questions resulted in higher proportions of scientific answers than open questions, and children appeared to have naïve mental models of the Earth only when the mental model theorists' coding scheme was used. These findings support the view that children tend to have ‘fragments’ of scientific knowledge, and that naïve mental models of the Earth are methodological artifacts. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:ArticleID:ICD730
ark:/67375/WNG-8TKB2KSD-P
istex:207308097E012C1664C971DE4742A18514FAFD31
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1522-7227
1522-7219
1522-7219
DOI:10.1002/icd.730