On the evaluation of global sea-salt aerosol models at coastal/orographic sites
Sea-salt aerosol global models are typically evaluated against concentration observations at coastal stations that are unaffected by local surf conditions and thus considered representative of open ocean conditions. Despite recent improvements in sea-salt source functions, studies still show signifi...
Saved in:
Published in | Atmospheric environment (1994) Vol. 101; no. C; pp. 41 - 48 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Publication |
Language | English |
Published |
Goddard Space Flight Center
Elsevier Ltd
01.01.2015
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Sea-salt aerosol global models are typically evaluated against concentration observations at coastal stations that are unaffected by local surf conditions and thus considered representative of open ocean conditions. Despite recent improvements in sea-salt source functions, studies still show significant model errors in specific regions. Using a multiscale model, we investigated the effect of high model resolution (0.1° × 0.1° vs. 1° × 1.4°) upon sea-salt patterns in four stations from the University of Miami Network: Baring Head, Chatam Island, and Invercargill in New Zealand, and Marion Island in the sub-antarctic Indian Ocean. Normalized biases improved from +63.7% to +3.3% and correlation increased from 0.52 to 0.84. The representation of sea/land interfaces, mesoscale circulations, and precipitation with the higher resolution model played a major role in the simulation of annual concentration trends. Our results recommend caution when comparing or constraining global models using surface concentration observations from coastal stations.
•Sea-salt global models are often compared to surface concentration climatologies.•Models exhibit strong biases at several coastal stations.•Mesoscale phenomena can significantly affect model behavior in coastal stations.•High model resolution strongly improved annual concentration trends.•Caution may be taken when comparing global models in coastal stations. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | GSFC GSFC-E-DAA-TN19643 Goddard Space Flight Center ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 USDOE |
ISSN: | 1352-2310 1873-2844 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.019 |