Optimising Complex Surgical Trays Based on PDSA Cycles

• Published in: Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare Vol. 16; pp. 3619 - 3628
• Main Authors: Duan, Hong-Xia, Wang, Xiu-Mei, Guo, Yue, Wei, Ling, Hao, Rui-Xia, Guo, Zhen-Shan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dove Medical Press Limited 30.11.2023; Dove; Dove Medical Press
• Subjects: China; external instruments; Hospitals; item counting; Job satisfaction; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Nurses; operating theatre; optimisation configuration; Original Research; scientific management; work efficiency; China
• ISSN: 1178-2390; 1178-2390
• DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S435427

Objective: To investigate the application of a multidisciplinary collaboration model to optimise the configuration management of orthopaedic external device sets in general hospitals. Methods: A pretest-post-test study design was used. Sixty patients who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty and 60 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion between March and May 2022 were recruited as the control stage. Additionally, a total of 120 patients, 60 of each, who underwent the two procedures between September and November 2022, were recruited as the experimental stage. For the control stage, conventional external equipment management was used, and for the experimental stage, an external device management programme was implemented based on multidisciplinary collaboration with the control stage. Based on the PDSA cycle, the configuration management of orthopaedic external device sets was optimised, and the differences in collating and counting external devices, nurses' overtime in the external device stage and orthopaedic surgeon satisfaction were compared between the two stages. Results: Compared with the control stage, the collation count took less time (8.65 [+ or -] 0.25 min vs 5.37 [+ or -] 0.13 min; 13.55 [+ or -] 1.10 min vs 7.85 [+ or -] 0.82 min), the number of overtime hours was shorter (175.80 [+ or -] 12.19 min vs 96.68 [+ or -] 13.66 min) and orthopaedic surgeon satisfaction was improved (4.58 [+ or -] 0.62 vs 4.10 [+ or -] 0.68; 4.33 [+ or -] 0.73 vs 3.87 [+ or -] 0.77; 4.20 [+ or -] 0.71 vs 3.82 [+ or -] 0.71; 4.12 [+ or -] 0.69 vs 3.87 [+ or -] 0.72; 4.05 [+ or -] 0.68 vs 3.79 [+ or -] 0.68) in the experimental stage (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: Multidisciplinary collaboration offers various benefits for optimising the configuration of external device sets, such as reducing the time taken for the preoperative sorting and counting of external devices, enhancing nurses' work efficiency and improving surgeons' job satisfaction; therefore, it is worthy of reference in clinical practice. Keywords: operating theatre, optimisation configuration, external instruments, item counting, scientific management, work efficiency