Induction of Chromosome Instability by Activation of Yes-Associated Protein and Forkhead Box M1 in Liver Cancer

Background & Aims Many different types of cancer cells have chromosome instability. The hippo pathway leads to phosphorylation of the transcriptional activator yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1, YAP), which regulates proliferation and has been associated with the development of liver cancer. We inv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943) Vol. 152; no. 8; pp. 2037 - 2051.e22
Main Authors Weiler, Sofia M.E, Pinna, Federico, Wolf, Thomas, Lutz, Teresa, Geldiyev, Aman, Sticht, Carsten, Knaub, Maria, Thomann, Stefan, Bissinger, Michaela, Wan, Shan, Rössler, Stephanie, Becker, Diana, Gretz, Norbert, Lang, Hauke, Bergmann, Frank, Ustiyan, Vladimir, Kalin, Tatiana V, Singer, Stephan, Lee, Ju-Seog, Marquardt, Jens U, Schirmacher, Peter, Kalinichenko, Vladimir V, Breuhahn, Kai
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2017
Subjects
CIN
YAP
_
PBS
CIN
HCC
PCR
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background & Aims Many different types of cancer cells have chromosome instability. The hippo pathway leads to phosphorylation of the transcriptional activator yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1, YAP), which regulates proliferation and has been associated with the development of liver cancer. We investigated the effects of hippo signaling via YAP on chromosome stability and hepatocarcinogenesis in human beings and mice. Methods We analyzed transcriptome data from 242 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to search for gene signatures associated with chromosomal instability; we investigated associations with overall survival time and cancer recurrence using Kaplan–Meier curves. We analyzed changes in expression of these signature genes, at messenger RNA and protein levels, after small interfering RNA–mediated silencing of YAP in Sk-Hep1, SNU182, HepG2, or pancreatic cancer cells, as well as incubation with thiostrepton (an inhibitor of forkhead box M1 [FOXM1]) or verteporfin (inhibitor of the interaction between YAP and TEA domain transcription factor 4 [TEAD4]). We performed co-immunoprecipitation and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. We collected liver tissues from mice that express a constitutively active form of YAP (YAPS127A ) and analyzed gene expression signatures and histomorphologic parameters associated with chromosomal instability. Mice were given injections of thiostrepton and livers were collected and analyzed by immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry, histology, and real-time polymerase chain reaction. We performed immunohistochemical analyses on tissue microarrays of 105 HCCs and 7 nontumor liver tissues. Results Gene expression patterns associated with chromosome instability, called CIN25 and CIN70, were detected in HCCs from patients with shorter survival time or early cancer recurrence. TEAD4 and YAP were required for CIN25 and CIN70 signature expression via induction and binding of FOXM1. Disrupting the interaction between YAP and TEAD4 with verteporfin, or inhibiting FOXM1 with thiostrepton, reduced the chromosome instability gene expression patterns. Hyperplastic livers and tumors from YAPS127A mice had increased CIN25 and CIN70 gene expression patterns, aneuploidy, and defects in mitosis. Injection of YAPS127A mice with thiostrepton reduced liver overgrowth and signs of chromosomal instability. In human HCC tissues, high levels of nuclear YAP correlated with increased chromosome instability gene expression patterns and aneuploidy. Conclusions By analyzing cell lines, genetically modified mice, and HCC tissues, we found that YAP cooperates with FOXM1 to contribute to chromosome instability. Agents that disrupt this pathway might be developed as treatments for liver cancer. Transcriptome data are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus public database (accession numbers: GSE32597 and GSE73396 ).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0016-5085
1528-0012
DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.018