Does higher radiation dose lead to better outcome for non-operated localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy? A population based propensity-score matched analysis

Abstract Background The optimal radiotherapy dose for non-operated localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NOL-ESCC) patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is hotly debated. Methods We identified eligible patients diagnosed within 2008–2013 from Taiwan Cancer Registry and cons...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiotherapy and oncology Vol. 120; no. 1; pp. 136 - 139
Main Authors Chen, Chih-Yi, Li, Chia-Chin, Chien, Chun-Ru
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.07.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background The optimal radiotherapy dose for non-operated localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NOL-ESCC) patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is hotly debated. Methods We identified eligible patients diagnosed within 2008–2013 from Taiwan Cancer Registry and constructed a propensity score matched cohort (1:1 for high dose (⩾60 Gy) vs standard dose (50–50.4 Gy)) to balance observable potential confounders. We compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death between standard and high radiotherapy dose groups during the entire follow-up period. We performed sensitivity analysis (SA) to evaluate the robustness of our finding regarding potential unobserved confounders & index date definition. Results Our study population constituted 648 patients with well balance in observed co-variables. The HR of death when high dose was compared to standard dose was 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.64–0.88). Our result was sensitive to potential unobserved confounders but robust to alternative index date definition in SA. Conclusions We found that higher than standard radiotherapy dose may lead to better survival for NOL-ESCC patients undergoing CCRT.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-8140
1879-0887
DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.042