Demoralization Scale in Spanish-Speaking Palliative Care Patients

• Published in: Journal of pain and symptom management Vol. 51; no. 4; pp. 769 - 775.e1
• Main Authors: Rudilla, David, PhD, Galiana, Laura, PhD, Oliver, Amparo, PhD, Barreto, Pilar, PhD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.04.2016
• Subjects: Aged; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care; Anxiety - diagnosis; confirmatory factor analyses; Cross-Sectional Studies; Demoralization; depression; Depression - diagnosis; Europe; exploratory structural equation models; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Pain Medicine; Palliative Care - methods; Palliative Care - psychology; Psychological Tests; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results; Stress, Psychological - diagnosis; Translating; Translations; exploratory structural equation models; depression; confirmatory factor analyses; Demoralization
• ISSN: 0885-3924; 1873-6513
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.11.019

Abstract Context Among the approaches to the demoralization syndrome, the one proposed by Kissane et al. is prevalent in the literature. These authors developed the Demoralization Scale (DS) to assess emotional distress, conceived as demoralization. Objectives To present the Spanish adaptation of the Demoralization Scale in palliative care patients, with a new and more comprehensive approach to its factorial structure. Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in 226 Spanish palliative care patients in three different settings: hospital, home care unit, and continued care unit. Outcome measures included the DS and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Analyses comprised confirmatory factor analyses to test the original, German, and Irish structure of the DS, exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), estimations of internal consistency, and multivariate analyses of variance for criterion-related validity. Results The confirmatory factor analyses showed inappropriate fit for the previous structures when studied in the Spanish version of the DS. With ESEM, the best fitting structure was the five-factor solution, without item 18. Reliability results offered good estimations of internal consistency for all the dimensions except for sense of failure. Cronbach alpha coefficients were appropriate for the dimensions of loss of meaning (0.86), helplessness (0.79), disheartenment (0.88), and dysphoria (0.80), but low reliability was found for sense of failure (0.62). Convergent and discriminant validity showed positive correlations between demoralization, anxiety, and depression. Patients with higher levels of anxiety had higher scores on every dimension of demoralization, and those with higher levels of depression had higher scores on loss of meaning, disheartenment, and sense of failure, but not on dysphoria or helplessness. Conclusion The Spanish adaptation of the DS has shown appropriate psychometric properties. It has been useful to differentiate between depression and the demoralization syndrome, pointing to helplessness and dysphoria as unique characteristics of demoralized palliative care patients.