Capillary imbibition in open-cell monodisperse foams

The measured rise velocity of liquid in solid foam is one order of magnitude smaller than the predicted value. This deviation is attributed to the excess time spent by the liquid-gas interface at connections between pores. [Display omitted] Hypothesis: Although capillary imbibition of solid foams is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of colloid and interface science Vol. 571; pp. 166 - 173
Main Authors Pitois, Olivier, Kaddami, Asmaa, Langlois, Vincent
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2020
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The measured rise velocity of liquid in solid foam is one order of magnitude smaller than the predicted value. This deviation is attributed to the excess time spent by the liquid-gas interface at connections between pores. [Display omitted] Hypothesis: Although capillary imbibition of solid foams is involved in many industrial applications, general theory for capillary imbibition has never been proved to apply for this specific class of porous materials. Experiments: In order to compare accurately experiment and theory we produce solid foam samples with monodisperse pore size distributions and tunable pore volume fraction, and we measure their permeability (Darcy), their capillary pressure and their imbibition rate. Findings: Our findings reveal that the imbibition velocity is qualitatively compatible with the Washburn theory but it is one order of magnitude smaller than the predicted value. This deviation is attributed to the excess time spent by the liquid-gas interface through connections between pores, for which an empirical expression is provided as a function of pore size and solid volume fraction. Our results provide the first step to understand deeply the imbibition process in foams and to predict imbibition rates for various foamed materials.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-9797
1095-7103
DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2020.03.013