A comparative analysis of megacity expansions in China and the U.S.: Patterns, rates and driving forces

•Chinese megacities have five times higher urban expansion in area than American megacities in past three decades.•Chinese megacities have obvious urbanization patterns and rates at temporal scale but American megacities do not have.•Chinese megacities expand from urban to rural with concentric ring...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLandscape and urban planning Vol. 132; pp. 121 - 135
Main Authors Kuang, Wenhui, Chi, Wenfeng, Lu, Dengsheng, Dou, Yinyin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.12.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Chinese megacities have five times higher urban expansion in area than American megacities in past three decades.•Chinese megacities have obvious urbanization patterns and rates at temporal scale but American megacities do not have.•Chinese megacities expand from urban to rural with concentric rings but American megacities fill open spaces within inner cities.•Chinese megacities are in developing stage that population, economic conditions and policies affect urbanization patterns and rates.•American megacities are in developed stages without obvious impacts from population, economic conditions and policies. Research on physical characteristics and land-cover dynamic changes of megacities over time provides valuable insights for effectively regulating urban planning and management. This study conducts a comparative analysis of 30-year urban expansion patterns and rates among three metropolises in China (Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou) and another three in the USA (New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago) based on time-series impervious surface area (ISA) data extracted from multitemporal Landsat images using the linear spectral mixture analysis approach. This research indicates significantly different urbanization patterns and rates between the Chinese and American megacities. The ISA expansion area in Chinese megacities was five times higher than that in American megacities during the past three decades. The Chinese megacities expand outward from the urban core to the periphery in a concentric ring structure, whereas the American megacities increase ISA mainly within the inner cities with patch-filling patterns. The Chinese megacities are in the development stage where population and economic conditions significantly influence urban expansion patterns and rates, but the American megacities are in the developed stage where population and economic conditions are not important forces driving the ISA expansion. The ISA intensity in the American megacities decreases constantly and smoothly, but ISA intensity in Chinese megacities decays abruptly within certain distances, depending on different cities and years. The most obvious urban expansions were between 8 and 20km in Beijing in the 1980s, between 14 and 50km in Shanghai in the 2000s, and between 8 and 18km in Guangzhou in the 1990s.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0169-2046
1872-6062
DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.015