Clinical impact of second harmonic imaging and left heart contrast in echocardiographic stress testing

• Published in: The American journal of cardiology Vol. 85; no. 6; pp. 740 - 743
• Main Authors: Finkelhor, Robert S, Pajouh, Mehdi, Kett, Attila, Stefanski, Richelle, Bosich, Georgene, Youssefi, Mojtaba E, Bahler, Robert C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 15.03.2000; Elsevier; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Albumins; Biological and medical sciences; Cardiac Catheterization; Cardiology; Cardiovascular system; Contrast Media; Echocardiography, Stress - methods; Exercise Test; Female; Fluorocarbons; Heart; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Male; Medical imaging; Medical sciences; Microspheres; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Stress; Ultrasonic investigative techniques; Sonography; Human; Pharmacologic test; Echocardiography; Dobutamine; Cardiovascular disease; Exploration; Left heart; Second harmonic; Exercise tolerance test; Diagnosis; Technique; Contrast media
• ISSN: 0002-9149; 1879-1913
• DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00851-6

Second harmonic imaging and left heart contrast agents are recent echocardiographic advancements that enhance the assessment of wall motion. Because little information exists concerning their clinical impact on echocardiographic stress testing in daily practice, this was determined for 9-month periods before (1997) and after (1998) their introduction. Harmonic imaging was used in all patients after its introduction. A second generation intravenous left heart contrast agent (Optison) was used at the discretion of the sonographer and physician team. Both exercise and dobutamine stress tests were included. At the time of study interpretation, diagnostic confidence was assigned as high, medium, or low. For all patients who underwent coronary angiography ≤6 months after stress testing, the diagnostic accuracy was determined (true positive plus true negative/total studies). There were 574 studies before and 746 studies after implementation. Optison was used in 28% of the harmonic imaging studies. Study cancellations due to uninterpretable images fell from 6.4% to 1.2% (p <0.001) despite a more obese population completing testing (body mass index: 29 ± 7 to 31 ± 8 kg/m 2, p = 0.02), whereas high diagnostic confidence increased from 55% to 64% (p <0.001). For the 7% of patients who underwent cardiac catheterization, the diagnostic accuracy remained unchanged (74 vs 73%) although a prior negative stress test was less common (40% to 20% p = 0.04). Thus, these new technologies had a favorable clinical impact.