Effect of preen oil on plumage bacteria: An experimental test with the mallard

• Published in: Behavioural processes Vol. 92; pp. 1 - 5
• Main Authors: Giraudeau, M., Czirják, G.Á., Duval, C., Bretagnolle, V., Gutierrez, C., Guillon, N., Heeb, P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.01.2013; Elsevier
• Subjects: Anas platyrhynchos; Animal ethology; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; anti-infective properties; bacteria; bacterial communities; Bacterial Load; Biological and medical sciences; descriptive studies; ducks; Ducks - physiology; Environmental Sciences; Feather-degrading bacteria; feathers; Feathers - microbiology; Feathers - physiology; Female; flight; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General aspects; Grooming - physiology; growth retardation; in vitro studies; Male; microbial growth; Microbial load; natural selection; oils; Passeriformes; Preen oil; preening; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Sebaceous Glands; Sebum - physiology; thermoregulation; uropygial gland; Microbial load; Anas platyrhynchos; Preen oil; Feather-degrading bacteria; Load; Plumage; Anatidae; Experimental study; Vertebrata; Oil; Bacteria; Feather; Microorganism; Aves
• ISSN: 0376-6357; 1872-8308
• DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.08.001

► Feather-degrading bacteria degrade feathers rapidly under laboratory conditions. ► Recent in vitro studies provided evidence that preen oil inhibited the growth of some feather-degrading strains. ► Preen oil antimicrobial properties remained to be experimentally tested in vivo. ► We carried an experiment with mallards with free or blocked access to their preen gland. ► We did not find any significant effect of our treatment on total and feather-degrading bacterial loads. Feathers are essential for avian thermoregulation, communication or flight and a reduction of plumage condition may alter these functions and reduce individual fitness. Recently, descriptive studies provided evidence that birds carry feather-degrading bacteria on their plumage that have the ability to degrade feathers rapidly under laboratory conditions. If such bacteria reduce avian fitness, natural selection should favour the evolution of anti-bacterial defences to limit the effects of these detrimental microorganisms. Preening behaviour and associated preen gland secretions have been proposed as the main factor used by birds to limit feather-degrading bacterial growth and some recent in vitro studies provided evidence that uropygial oil inhibited the growth of some keratinolytic strains in passerines. However, preen oil antimicrobial properties remained to be experimentally tested in vivo. We conducted an experiment with mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) onto which we fixed a removable mechanism that blocked access to the uropygial gland in a first group of mallards, whilst birds in a second group had the same removable mechanism but access to their gland and a third group of birds had normal access to their gland. We found no significant effect of our treatment on total and feather-degrading bacterial loads. Three hypotheses may explain the discrepancy between our results and previous in vitro studies. First, in vitro studies may have over-estimated the bactericidal properties of the preen oil. Second, preen gland deprivation may have affected only a small portion of the feather-degrading bacterial community. Third, ducks and passerine oils might have different bactericidal properties.