Fatigue behavior of resin-modified monolithic CAD–CAM RNC crowns and endocrowns

Highlights • No significant differences were found in terms of fatigue resistance between crowns and endocrowns. • Monolithic crowns performed better than the buccal-occlusal veneered counterparts. • Endocrowns fractured predominantly with a mesio-distal wedge-opening fracture (82%). • Partial cusp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDental materials Vol. 32; no. 12; pp. e338 - e350
Main Authors Rocca, G.T, Sedlakova, P, Saratti, C.M, Sedlacek, R, Gregor, L, Rizcalla, N, Feilzer, A.J, Krejci, I
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2016
Subjects
Advanced Basic Science
CAD/CAM
CADCAM
Composite Resins
Computer aided design
Computer aided manufacturing
Crowns
Dental Porcelain
Dental Stress Analysis
Dentistry
Endocrown
Endodontically treated teeth
Fatigue
Fractography
Fracture mechanics
Lava Ultimate
Nanostructure
Polymers
Resins
Restoration
Veenering
Lava Ultimate
CAD/CAM
Endocrown
Endodontically treated teeth
Fatigue
Fractography
Veenering
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Highlights • No significant differences were found in terms of fatigue resistance between crowns and endocrowns. • Monolithic crowns performed better than the buccal-occlusal veneered counterparts. • Endocrowns fractured predominantly with a mesio-distal wedge-opening fracture (82%). • Partial cusp fractures were observed above all in crowns (70%).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0109-5641
1879-0097
DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.024