Does Macaronesia exist? Conflicting signal in the bryophyte and pteridophyte floras

Macaronesia, which includes five mid-Atlantic archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Selvagems, Canaries, and Cape Verdes), has been traditionally recognized as a distinct biogeographic unit whose circumscription has been intimately associated with the hypothesis that the flora is a relict of a formerly bro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of botany Vol. 94; no. 4; pp. 625 - 639
Main Authors Vanderpoorten, A, Rumsey, F.J, Carine, M.A
Format Journal Article Web Resource
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Botanical Society of America 01.04.2007
Botanical Soc America
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Macaronesia, which includes five mid-Atlantic archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Selvagems, Canaries, and Cape Verdes), has been traditionally recognized as a distinct biogeographic unit whose circumscription has been intimately associated with the hypothesis that the flora is a relict of a formerly broadly distributed subtropical Tertiary flora. The concept of Macaronesia is revisited here using parsimony and Bayesian analyses of floristic data sets for the moss, liverwort, and pteridophyte floras. All analyses reject the monophyly of Macaronesia s.l., resolving the Cape Verdes with tropical Africa. Of the other Macaronesian archipelagos, the liverwort and pteridophyte analyses support, or could not reject, an Azorean-Madeiran-Canarian clade (hereafter Macaronesia s.s.), but the moss analysis resolves the Canary Islands as sister to North Africa, thus rejecting the concept of Macaronesia s.s. for this group. Dynamic interchange of taxa with neighboring continental areas rather than relictualism best explains the relationships of the Cape Verde cryptogamic flora and the Canary Island moss flora. In contrast, relictualism is consistent with a monophyletic Macaronesia s.s. for liverworts and pteridophytes. However, from the limited information available on relationships of endemic cryptogams, this explanation alone may be unsatisfactory. Spatially congruent patterns may, in fact, conceal a complex mixture of relictual distributions and more recent speciation and dispersal events.
Bibliography:http://www.amjbot.org/
This research was initiated at the Natural History Museum in the context of the EEC Synthesys exchange program. Many thanks are due to R. Schumacker and two anonymous referees for their constructive comments on a first draft of this paper. A.V. acknowledges financial support from the Belgian Funds for Scientific Research.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
scopus-id:2-s2.0-34250734091
ISSN:0002-9122
1537-2197
1537-2197
DOI:10.3732/ajb.94.4.625