Sperm Membrane Behaviour during Cooling and Cryopreservation

• Published in: Reproduction in domestic animals Vol. 50; no. S3; pp. 20 - 26
• Main Authors: Sieme, H, Oldenhof, H, Wolkers, WF
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany P. Parey Scientific Publishers 01.09.2015; Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subjects: Animals; Cell Membrane - physiology; Cell Membrane - ultrastructure; cell membranes; cholesterol; Cooling; cryopreservation; Cryopreservation - veterinary; Cryoprotective Agents; freezing; glycerol; Horses; ice; ice nucleation; Male; mechanism of action; Membranes; Osmotic Pressure - physiology; osmotolerance; Phase Transition; Phase transitions; reproduction; semen; Semen Preservation - adverse effects; Semen Preservation - methods; Semen Preservation - veterinary; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Sperm; Sperm Motility; spermatozoa; Spermatozoa - physiology; Spermatozoa - ultrastructure; sucrose; Temperature
• ISSN: 0936-6768; 1439-0531
• DOI: 10.1111/rda.12594

Native sperm is only marginally stable after collection. Cryopreservation of semen facilitates transport and storage for later use in artificial reproduction technologies, but cryopreservation processing may result in cellular damage compromising sperm function. Membranes are thought to be the primary site of cryopreservation injury. Therefore, insights into the effects of cooling, ice formation and protective agents on sperm membranes may help to rationally design cryopreservation protocols. In this review, we describe membrane phase behaviour of sperm at supra‐ and subzero temperatures. In addition, factors affecting membrane phase transitions and stability, sperm osmotic tolerance limits and mode of action of cryoprotective agents are discussed. It is shown how cooling only results in minor thermotropic non‐cooperative phase transitions, whereas freezing causes sharp lyotropic fluid‐to‐gel phase transitions. Membrane cholesterol content affects suprazero membrane phase behaviour and osmotic tolerance. The rate and extent of cellular dehydration coinciding with freezing‐induced membrane phase transitions are affected by the cooling rate and ice nucleation temperature and can be modulated by cryoprotective agents. Permeating agents such as glycerol can move across cellular membranes, whereas non‐permeating agents such as sucrose cannot. Both, permeating and non‐permeating protectants preserve biomolecular and cellular structures by forming a protective glassy state during freezing.