Charges for maternity services: associations with provider type and payer source in a university teaching hospital
Objectives: Considerable evidence exists that payer status influences the type and cost of services provided. If payer status influences care, consumers may receive differential care secondary to presence and type of payer. This study examines the effect of payer status on certified nurse-midwives (...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of midwifery & women's health Vol. 45; no. 5; pp. 378 - 383 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Elsevier Inc
01.09.2000
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objectives: Considerable evidence exists that payer status influences the type and cost of services provided. If payer status influences care, consumers may receive differential care secondary to presence and type of payer. This study examines the effect of payer status on certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) and obstetricians (OBs), correcting for methodologic problems that have been noted in previous studies.
Methods/findings: Participants were 715 low-risk pregnant women seen in the CNM or OB practice in a university hospital service. All billed charges from the initial prenatal visit through two months postpartum were compared by payer. Charges by provider were also examined to determine the presence of differential payer effect. Unexpectedly, charges by payer did not show significant variance, nor did payer differently affect providers. Charges by provider type varied significantly, with CNMs having lower mean charges than OBs.
Conclusions: Differences in practice by payer source were not found for either provider group. This may reflect a lack of financial incentives to alter practice based on the payer, the homogeneity of the participants, or the large number of payers. The findings indicate that provider decision-making styles are likely due to non-payer factors in a system that lacks clear incentives to alter care patterns. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-1GLDWKJ4-N ArticleID:JMWH2381 istex:208C431DCB401E36DD7D783C83BB67B2E1136CE7 This work is part of a project supported by the National Institute for Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Grant N. R01‐NR01887. The author wishes to thank Mona Lydon‐Rochelle, CNM, PhD for her review and comments and Deborah J. Oakley, PhD, for ongoing support. As noted in the text, the Institutional Review Board at the University of Michigan approved this study and informed consent was obtained from all participants. CNMs/CMs as used herein refer to those midwifery practitioners who are certified by the American College of Nurse‐Midwives (ACNM) or the ACNM Certification Council, Inc.; midwifery refers to the profession as practiced in accordance with the standards promulgated by the ACNM. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 1526-9523 1542-2011 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1526-9523(00)00042-8 |