Ultrasound-assisted surfactant-enhanced emulsification microextraction for the determination of carbamates in wines by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
•An UHPLC–MS/MS method is proposed for determination of 25 carbamates in different wines.•In order to obtain clean extracts, a new sample treatment based on UASEME has been developed.•LOQs are below maximum residue levels allowed by EU in the case of grape wines.•The proposed method could be a good...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of Chromatography A Vol. 1315; pp. 1 - 7 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
08.11.2013
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •An UHPLC–MS/MS method is proposed for determination of 25 carbamates in different wines.•In order to obtain clean extracts, a new sample treatment based on UASEME has been developed.•LOQs are below maximum residue levels allowed by EU in the case of grape wines.•The proposed method could be a good alternative for multi-carbamate determination in wine samples.
A new sensitive multiresidue method based on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS/MS) has been developed for the detection, confirmation and quantification of twenty five carbamates in wine samples. The separation was achieved in 5.5min, using a Zorbax Eclipse plus RRHD C18 column (50mm×2.1mm, 1.8μm), with a mobile phase of water and methanol, both of them with 0.01% formic acid. The analytes were detected in positive mode with multiple reaction monitoring mode. Ultrasound-assisted surfactant-enhanced emulsification microextraction (UASEME), using a low-density extraction solvent has been optimized for the satisfactory extraction of carbamates and clean-up of extracts. The matrix effect was studied, showing that the proposed procedure provides very clean extracts. Under optimum conditions, recoveries for fortified wine samples ranged from 74 to 102%, with relative standard deviations lower than 6%. Limits of quantification ranged from 0.15 to 0.92μgl−1, showing the high sensitivity of this fast and simple method and its compliance with current requirements. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2013.09.028 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0021-9673 1873-3778 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.09.028 |