Assessment of routine inspection methods for porcine cysticercosis in Zambian village pigs

The value of tongue and meat inspection as diagnostic tools for porcine cysticercosis was assessed in 65 Zambian village pigs by comparing the results with carcass dissections. In addition, the intensity of infections, distribution and viability of cysts in infected pigs were measured. Five pigs (7....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of helminthology Vol. 80; no. 1; pp. 69 - 72
Main Authors Phiri, I.K., Dorny, P., Gabriel, S., Willingham, A.L., Sikasunge, C., Siziya, S., Vercruysse, J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.03.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The value of tongue and meat inspection as diagnostic tools for porcine cysticercosis was assessed in 65 Zambian village pigs by comparing the results with carcass dissections. In addition, the intensity of infections, distribution and viability of cysts in infected pigs were measured. Five pigs (7.7%) were positive on tongue examination, while routine meat inspection showed 12 (18.5%) positives. However, carcass dissections detected cysticerci in 31 (47.7%) pigs. The range in number of cysticerci was 1 to 14,662 per carcass. Cysticerci were distributed throughout the carcass with the highest concentration in the heart, tongue and hind legs. In one animal 13 viable cysts were detected only in the brain. Fourteen pigs had more than 100 viable cysts, six between 2 and 100, and four had single cyst infections. Seven animals harboured only calcified cysts. These findings demonstrate the serious shortcomings of routine detection methods for porcine cysticercosis. While the specificity of tongue palpation and meat inspection was 100%, these tests failed to detect the infection in 83.9% and 61.3% of infected pigs, respectively.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/6GQ-30HLQX26-G
istex:D1E5A178EBAFB5066F2EC61AA19CF00CF6E945DC
ArticleID:00012
PII:S0022149X06000126
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-149X
1475-2697
DOI:10.1079/JOH2005314