Preoperative Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Assets and Drawbacks of Short Course and Long Course in Clinical Practice

Preoperative short-course radiotherapy and preoperative long-course chemoradiotherapy are the standards of care for high-risk rectal cancer in different parts of the world. Both treatments are effective in local control and carry a low morbidity. The advantage of short course is its simplicity, wher...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSeminars in radiation oncology Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 186 - 192
Main Author Ngan, Samuel Y.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Preoperative short-course radiotherapy and preoperative long-course chemoradiotherapy are the standards of care for high-risk rectal cancer in different parts of the world. Both treatments are effective in local control and carry a low morbidity. The advantage of short course is its simplicity, whereas long course has the advantage of downsizing tumors thus increasing the chance of sphincter preservation. Although 2 randomized trials comparing short course and long course have been performed, the better form of preoperative treatment remains a subject of discussion. This article reviews the evidence supporting each approach, and it discusses their relative merits and future directions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1053-4296
1532-9461
DOI:10.1016/j.semradonc.2016.02.007