Use of Amino-Terminal Pro–B-Type Natriuretic Peptide to Guide Outpatient Therapy of Patients With Chronic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether chronic heart failure (HF) therapy guided by concentrations of amino-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is superior to standard of care (SOC) management. It is unclear whether standard HF treatment plus a goal of reducing NT-proBNP conce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 58; no. 18; pp. 1881 - 1889
Main Authors Januzzi, James L., Rehman, Shafiq U., Mohammed, Asim A., Bhardwaj, Anju, Barajas, Linda, Barajas, Justine, Kim, Han-Na, Baggish, Aaron L., Weiner, Rory B., Chen-Tournoux, Annabel, Marshall, Jane E., Moore, Stephanie A., Carlson, William D., Lewis, Gregory D., Shin, Jordan, Sullivan, Dorothy, Parks, Kimberly, Wang, Thomas J., Gregory, Shawn A., Uthamalingam, Shanmugam, Semigran, Marc J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 25.10.2011
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this study was to evaluate whether chronic heart failure (HF) therapy guided by concentrations of amino-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is superior to standard of care (SOC) management. It is unclear whether standard HF treatment plus a goal of reducing NT-proBNP concentrations improves outcomes compared with standard management alone. In a prospective single-center trial, 151 subjects with HF due to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction were randomized to receive either standard HF care plus a goal to reduce NT-proBNP concentrations ≤1,000 pg/ml or SOC management. The primary endpoint was total cardiovascular events between groups compared using generalized estimating equations. Secondary endpoints included effects of NT-proBNP–guided care on patient quality of life as well as cardiac structure and function, assessed with echocardiography. Through a mean follow-up period of 10 ± 3 months, a significant reduction in the primary endpoint of total cardiovascular events was seen in the NT-proBNP arm compared with SOC (58 events vs. 100 events, p = 0.009; logistic odds for events 0.44, p = 0.02); Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significant differences in time to first event, favoring NT-proBNP–guided care (p = 0.03). No age interaction was found, with elderly patients benefitting similarly from NT-proBNP–guided care as younger subjects. Compared with SOC, NT-proBNP–guided patients had greater improvements in quality of life, demonstrated greater relative improvements in LV ejection fraction, and had more significant improvements in both LV end-systolic and -diastolic volume indexes. In patients with HF due to LV systolic dysfunction, NT-proBNP–guided therapy was superior to SOC, with reduced event rates, improved quality of life, and favorable effects on cardiac remodeling. (Use of NT-proBNP Testing to Guide Heart Failure Therapy in the Outpatient Setting; NCT00351390)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.072