A 2-Week, Crossover Study to Investigate the Effect of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray on Short-Term Growth in Children with Allergic Rhinitis
Abstract Background: It is essential to assess potential growth effects of any newly developed corticosteroid. Fluticasone furoate is a recently approved, enhanced- affinity intranasal corticosteroid with low systemic bioavailability and proven efficacy in treating allergic rhinitis. Objective: The...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical therapeutics Vol. 29; no. 8; pp. 1738 - 1747 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Belle Mead, NJ
EM Inc USA
01.08.2007
Excerpta Medica Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Background: It is essential to assess potential growth effects of any newly developed corticosteroid. Fluticasone furoate is a recently approved, enhanced- affinity intranasal corticosteroid with low systemic bioavailability and proven efficacy in treating allergic rhinitis. Objective: The aim of the current study was to assess whether treatment with fluticasone furoate nasal spray affected the short-term lower-leg growth rate in children with allergic rhinitis. Methods: Prepubertal children with seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis of at least 1 year's duration were included in this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. The study consisted of 4 periods, each of 2 weeks' duration screening, then 2 treatment periods separated by a washout). Study medications were fluticasone furoate nasal spray 110 µg and placebo nasal spray, both administered QD in the morning. The primary end point, lower-leg growth rate (measured in millimeters per week), was assessed by knemometry. Adverse events were also assessed. Results: Fifty-eight patients were randomized to the study and comprised the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (mean [SD] age, 9.1 [1.4] years; 39 males, 19 females). Five patients were excluded from the ITT group due to protocol violations; thus, 53 patients (mean [SD] age, 9.0 [1.4] years; 35 males, 18 females) comprised the growth population (a de facto per-protocol group). In the growth population, the adjusted mean lower-leg growth rate was 0.40 and 0.42 mm/wk with fluticasone furoate and placebo, respectively. The difference in adjusted mean lower-leg growth rate between fluticasone furoate and placebo was -0.016 mm/wk (95% CI, −0.13 to 0.10). Fluticasone furoate was noninferior to placebo, as the lower boundary of the 95% CI was above the prespecified noninferiority margin of −0.20 mm/wk. These results were supported by the ITT analysis. Fluticasone furoate nasal spray was well tolerated and had an adverse-event profile similar to that of placebo nasal spray. Nasopharyngitis (placebo, 4; fluticasone furoate, 1) and headache (placebo, 3; fluticasone furoate, 1) were the most frequent adverse events during the treatment periods. Conclusion: In this study, fluticasone furoate nasal spray 110 µg QD for 2 weeks had no effect on lower-leg growth rate in these prepubertal children with allergic rhinitis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0149-2918 1879-114X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.08.017 |