Chlorhexidine–Alcohol versus Povidone–Iodine for Surgical-Site Antisepsis

The skin is a source of infection associated with surgery. In this multicenter, randomized trial, the preoperative application of chlorhexidine–alcohol was found to be a more effective skin preparation than povidone–iodine for preventing incisional infections. The preoperative application of chlorhe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe New England journal of medicine Vol. 362; no. 1; pp. 18 - 26
Main Authors Darouiche, Rabih O, Wall, Matthew J, Itani, Kamal M.F, Otterson, Mary F, Webb, Alexandra L, Carrick, Matthew M, Miller, Harold J, Awad, Samir S, Crosby, Cynthia T, Mosier, Michael C, AlSharif, Atef, Berger, David H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Waltham, MA Massachusetts Medical Society 07.01.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The skin is a source of infection associated with surgery. In this multicenter, randomized trial, the preoperative application of chlorhexidine–alcohol was found to be a more effective skin preparation than povidone–iodine for preventing incisional infections. The preoperative application of chlorhexidine–alcohol was found to be a more effective skin preparation than povidone–iodine for preventing incisional infections. Despite the implementation of preoperative preventive measures, which include skin cleansing with povidone–iodine, surgical-site infection occurs in 300,000 to 500,000 patients who undergo surgery in the United States each year. 1 – 6 Since the patient's skin is a major source of pathogens, it is conceivable that improving skin antisepsis would decrease surgical-site infections. 7 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that 2% chlorhexidine-based preparations be used to cleanse the site of insertion of vascular catheters. 8 However, the CDC has not issued a recommendation as to which antiseptics should be used preoperatively to prevent postoperative surgical-site infection in the 27 . . .
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-General Information-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa0810988