Information needs of early-stage prostate cancer patients: A comparison of nine countries

• Published in: Radiotherapy and oncology Vol. 94; no. 3; pp. 328 - 333
• Main Authors: Feldman-Stewart, Deb, Capirci, Carlo, Brennenstuhl, Sarah, Tong, Christine, Abacioglu, Ufuk, Gawkowska-Suwinska, Marzena, van Gils, Francis, Heyda, Alicja, Igdem, Sefik, Macias, Victor, Grillo, Isabel Monteiro, Moynihan, Clare, Pijls-Johannesma, Madelon, Parker, Chris, Pimentel, Nuno, Wördehoff, Herbert
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ireland Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.03.2010
• Subjects: Aged; Early-stage prostate cancer; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine; Humans; Male; Patient education; Patient information needs; Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy; Retrospective Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires; Patient information needs; Patient education; Early-stage prostate cancer
• ISSN: 0167-8140; 1879-0887
• DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.12.038

Abstract Background and purpose Providing information to patients can improve their medical and psychological outcomes. We sought to identify core information needs common to most early-stage prostate cancer patients in participating countries. Material and methods Convenience samples of patients treated 3–24 months earlier were surveyed in Canada, England, Italy, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Netherlands, Spain, and Turkey. Each participant rated the importance of addressing each of 92 questions in the diagnosis-to-treatment decision interval (essential/desired/no opinion/avoid). Multivariate modelling determined the extent of variance accounted by covariates, and produced an unbiased prediction of the proportion of essential responses for each question. Results Six hundred and fifty-nine patients responded (response rates 45–77%). On average, 35–53 questions were essential within each country; similar questions were essential to most patients in most countries. Beyond cross-country similarities, each country showed wide variability in the number and which questions were essential. Multivariate modelling showed an adjusted R -squared with predictors country, age, education, and treatment group of only 6% of the variance. A core of 20 questions were predicted to be essential to >2/3 of patients. Conclusions Core information can be identified across countries. However, providing the core should only be a first step; each country should then provide information tailored to the needs of the individual patient.