Tumor recurrence criteria for postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography after surgical treatment of oral cancer and flap repair

Objective: To characterize the computed tomography (CT) findings that distinguish cancer recurrence from postoperative changes that mimic such recurrence. Study Design: We evaluated a total of 72 CT scans from 32 patients who had undergone surgery with either pectoralis major myocutaneous flap or fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics Vol. 90; no. 3; pp. 369 - 376
Main Authors Chikui, Toru, Yuasa, Kenji, Inagaki, Masafumi, Ohishi, Masamichi, Shirasuna, Kanemitsu, Kanda, Shigenobu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published St. Louis, MO Mosby, Inc 01.09.2000
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: To characterize the computed tomography (CT) findings that distinguish cancer recurrence from postoperative changes that mimic such recurrence. Study Design: We evaluated a total of 72 CT scans from 32 patients who had undergone surgery with either pectoralis major myocutaneous flap or forearm flap. The observers evaluated the presence and pattern of enhancement, the presence of low density areas, and changes in the adipose tissue of the flap. Results: A persistent zone of high attenuation over 6 months suggested the high possibility of recurrence. However, an enhancement within 6 months occurred both with the recurrent tumor and with postoperative tissue. In the patients with recurrence (n = 12), the enhanced areas were focal (n = 8) or diffuse (n = 4). Focal-type recurrence often occurred at the posterior margin. The presence of low-density areas and changes in the adipose tissue in the flap are also helpful for detecting recurrence. Conclusions: The combination of several features seen on CT images can be useful in differentiating tumor recurrence from postoperative tissue changes. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:369-76)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1079-2104
1528-395X
DOI:10.1067/moe.2000.107355