Effect of cultivar mixtures of Finger millet [Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn.] on blast [Pyricularia grisea (Cooke) Sacc.] disease development under field conditions

• Published in: Heliyon Vol. 10; no. 4; p. e25327
• Main Authors: Manickam, Rajesh, Appusami, Sudha, Thangavelu, Sharavanan Periyanna, Kannan, Sivagamy, Angamuthu, Nirmalakumari, Thanga Hemavathy, A., Thiruvaliperumal, Balaji
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 29.02.2024; Elsevier
• Subjects: AUDPC; Blast resistance; Cost-benefit; Cultivar mixture; Yield; AUDPC; Cost-benefit; Yield; Blast resistance; Cultivar mixture
• ISSN: 2405-8440; 2405-8440
• DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25327

The study aimed to assess the impact of different combinations of cultivar mixtures on finger millet blast epidemics without affecting yield. The research employed Disease Progress Curves (DPCs) such as AUDPC, rAUDPC, and sAUDPC to evaluate leaf, neck and finger blast epidemics' severity at various time intervals. Treatments involved mixtures of pre-released cultures and commercial varieties, combined with resistant cultivars in ratios of 1:1 and 2:1 to combat blast disease. These mixtures were compared with monoculture performances (resistant and susceptible checks) and fungicide treatments. The mixture of pre-released cultures (TNEc 1285 + TNEc 1294 + TNEc 1310) combined with the resistant cultivar GE4449 at a 1:1 ratio demonstrated the most significant impact in reducing the Area Under Disease Progressive Curve (AUDPC) values for all three blast types while maintaining consistent yield. This treatment exhibited results comparable to fungicide (Tricyclazole 75% WP) sprays across trials conducted from September to December in both 2020 and 2021. Economically, the cost-benefit ratio favoured the culture composite despite its delayed onset and slower progression during disease epidemics under field conditions. The mixture of cultures demonstrated sustainable yield without requiring significant additional input costs or frequent fungicidal application in both trial periods. This suggests a promising and cost-effective approach to managing finger millet blast epidemics while maintaining yield stability in agricultural practices.