Exports and hedging exchange rate risks: the multi-country case
This article examines the optimal production, export allocation, and hedging decisions of a risk‐averse international firm that exports to several foreign markets with different currencies. The firm faces multiple exchange rate risks. Optimal decisions are analyzed under two scenarios. In the first,...
Saved in:
Published in | The journal of futures markets Vol. 20; no. 9; pp. 843 - 864 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.10.2000
Published by J. Wiley in affiliation with the Center for the Study of Futures Markets, Columbia University Wiley Periodicals Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This article examines the optimal production, export allocation, and hedging decisions of a risk‐averse international firm that exports to several foreign markets with different currencies. The firm faces multiple exchange rate risks. Optimal decisions are analyzed under two scenarios. In the first, there is a forward market for one currency only. Then, the export allocation to different markets is separable from the firm's preferences and the joint distribution of the exchange rates. In contrast, total production is not separable except for a special case. In the second scenario, there is a forward market for each currency. Then, both production and export allocation are separable. Hedging with forward contracts depends on risk premia and on the joint distribution of the exchange rates. If tradable exchange rate risk is a linear function of untradable exchange rate risk plus noise, there is a conflict between cross hedging and taking a basis risk. If, alternatively, the untradable exchange rate risk is a linear function of the tradable exchange rate risk and noise, there is no such conflict. A speculative position in a biased forward market for one currency can be cross hedged using an unbiased forward market for another currency. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 20:843–864, 2000. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-P9PZZPD1-1 istex:7EED630EDB238B37115719C0249A6B7CA759B2D0 ArticleID:FUT3 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0270-7314 1096-9934 |
DOI: | 10.1002/1096-9934(200010)20:9<843::AID-FUT3>3.0.CO;2-G |