Comparison of Chondrogensis in Static and Perfused Bioreactor Culture

As a result of the low yield of cartilage from primary patient harvests and a high demand for autologous cartilage for reconstructive surgery and structural repair, primary explant cartilage must be augmented by tissue engineering techniques. In this study, chondrocytes seeded on PLLA/PGA scaffolds...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiotechnology progress Vol. 16; no. 5; pp. 893 - 896
Main Authors Pazzano, David, Mercier, Kathi A., Moran, John M., Fong, Stephen S., DiBiasio, David D., Rulfs, Jill X., Kohles, Sean S., Bonassar, Lawrence J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published USA American Chemical Society 01.09.2000
American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:As a result of the low yield of cartilage from primary patient harvests and a high demand for autologous cartilage for reconstructive surgery and structural repair, primary explant cartilage must be augmented by tissue engineering techniques. In this study, chondrocytes seeded on PLLA/PGA scaffolds in static culture and a direct perfusion bioreactor were biochemically and histologically analyzed to determine the effects of fluid flow and media pH on matrix assembly. A gradual media pH change was maintained in the bioreactor within 7.4−6.96 over 2 weeks compared to a more rapid decrease from 7.4 to 6.58 in static culture over 3 days. Seeded scaffolds subjected to 1 μm/s flow demonstrated a 118% increase (p < 0.05) in DNA content, a 184% increase (p < 0.05) in GAG content, and a 155% (p< 0.05) increase in hydroxyproline content compared to static culture. Distinct differences were noted in tissue morphology, including more intense staining for proteoglycans by safranin‐O and alignment of cells in the direction of media flow. Culture of chondrocyte seeded matrices thus offers the possibility of rapid in vitro expansion of donor cartilage for the repair of structural defects, tracheal injury, and vascularized tissue damage.
Bibliography:istex:B505F171DF882A4E74EFC72B3819730B3F27B8F6
ArticleID:BTPR82
ark:/67375/WNG-TWSTG9FL-6
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:8756-7938
1520-6033
DOI:10.1021/bp000082v