Effects of vitamin D supplementation on endothelial function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

• Published in: European journal of nutrition Vol. 56; no. 3; pp. 1095 - 1104
• Main Authors: Hussin, Azizah Mat, Ashor, Ammar W., Schoenmakers, Inez, Hill, Tom, Mathers, John C., Siervo, Mario
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.04.2017; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: adiposity; adults; Blood Pressure - drug effects; body mass index; calcium; Chemistry; Chemistry and Materials Science; Databases, Factual; diastolic blood pressure; Dietary Supplements; Endothelium - drug effects; Endothelium - metabolism; health status; Humans; insulin; insulin resistance; meta-analysis; Nutrition; Original Contribution; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; systematic review; vitamin D; Vitamin D - administration & dosage; Vitamin D - blood; vitamin status; Pulse wave velocity; Forearm blood flow; Flow-mediated dilation; Vitamin D; Nitric oxide; Cardiovascular risk
• ISSN: 1436-6207; 1436-6215; 1436-6215
• DOI: 10.1007/s00394-016-1159-3

Background In addition to regulating calcium homoeostasis and bone health, vitamin D influences vascular and metabolic processes including endothelial function (EF) and insulin signalling. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were conducted to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on EF and to examine whether the effect size was modified by health status, study duration, dose, route of vitamin D administration, vitamin D status (baseline and post-intervention), body mass index (BMI), age and type of vitamin D. Methods We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases from inception until March 2015 for studies meeting the following criteria: (1) RCT with adult participants, (2) vitamin D administration alone, (3) studies that quantified EF using commonly applied methods including ultrasound, plethysmography, applanation tonometry and laser Doppler. Results Sixteen articles reporting data for 1177 participants were included. Study duration ranged from 4 to 52 weeks. The effect of vitamin D on EF was not significant (SMD: 0.08, 95 % CI −0.06, 0.22, p  = 0.28). Subgroup analysis showed a significant improvement of EF in diabetic subjects (SMD: 0.31, 95 % CI 0.05, 0.57, p  = 0.02). A non-significant trend was found for diastolic blood pressure ( β  = 0.02; p  = 0.07) and BMI ( β  = 0.05; p  = 0.06). Conclusions Vitamin D supplementation did not improve EF. The significant effect of vitamin D in diabetics and a tendency for an association with BMI may indicate a role of excess adiposity and insulin resistance in modulating the effects of vitamin D on vascular function. This remains to be tested in future studies.