Clinical impact of FDG PET-CT on the management of patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma

Aim To evaluate the impact of staging FDG PET-CT on the initial management of patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC) and any prognostic variables predicting survival. Materials and methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing FDG PET-CT for staging of LACC in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical radiology Vol. 69; no. 12; pp. 1235 - 1243
Main Authors Fleming, S, Cooper, R.A, Swift, S.E, Thygesen, H.H, Chowdhury, F.U, Scarsbrook, A.F, Patel, C.N
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim To evaluate the impact of staging FDG PET-CT on the initial management of patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC) and any prognostic variables predicting survival. Materials and methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing FDG PET-CT for staging of LACC in a single tertiary referral centre, between April 2008 and August 2011. Comparison was made between MRI and PET-CT findings and any subsequent impact on treatment intent or radiotherapy planning was evaluated. Results Sixty-three patients underwent FDG PET-CT for initial staging of LACC. Major impact on management was found in 20 patients (32%), a minor impact in five (8%), and no impact in 38 (60%). In those patients where PET-CT had a major impact, 12 had more extensive local nodal involvement, five had occult metastatic disease, two had synchronous tumours, and one patient had equivocal lymph nodes on MRI characterized as negative. PET-positive nodal status at diagnosis was found to be a statistically significant predictor of relapse-free survival ( p  < 0.05). Conclusion Staging FDG PET-CT has a major impact on the initial management of approximately one-third of patients with LACC by altering treatment intent and/or radiotherapy planning. PET-defined nodal status is a poor prognostic indicator.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-9260
1365-229X
DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2014.07.006