Bronchoscopy in North America: the ACCP survey

A mail survey of this type has several inherent drawbacks. First, answers to some of the questions, particularly those pertaining to complication rates, rely on the memory of participants. Second, the wording of certain questions may have imparted different meanings. Third, the format of the questio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChest Vol. 100; no. 6; p. 1668
Main Authors Prakash, U B, Offord, K P, Stubbs, S E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.12.1991
Subjects
Bronchoscopy - adverse effects
Bronchoscopy - methods
Bronchoscopy - statistics & numerical data
Data Collection
Humans
United States
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:A mail survey of this type has several inherent drawbacks. First, answers to some of the questions, particularly those pertaining to complication rates, rely on the memory of participants. Second, the wording of certain questions may have imparted different meanings. Third, the format of the questionnaire may have confused some. Fourth, one cannot expect that all questionnaires will be answered fully. Fifth, as indicated by several respondents, several important topics (eg, topical anesthetic agents and mode of their delivery, prophylaxis against infective endocarditis, tracheobronchial stent placement, endobronchial intraluminal radiotherapy) were not included. Many respondents suggested inclusion of these and other questions in future surveys. Nevertheless, in the absence of any survey looking into a large number of bronchoscopy-related practices, mail surveys have the advantage of reflecting nationwide practice rather than results from selected centers, and this report provides some insight into bronchoscopy practices in North America. While the results indicate the present trends in bronchoscopy practices in North America, they do not establish or recommend any standards in bronchoscopy.
ISSN:0012-3692
DOI:10.1378/chest.100.6.1668