Effect of Continued Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Ventricular Arrhythmias After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

• Published in: The American journal of cardiology Vol. 118; no. 4; pp. 556 - 559
• Main Authors: Schleifer, John William, MD, Mookadam, Farouk, MBBCh, Kransdorf, Evan P., MD, PhD, Nanda, Udai, DO, Adams, Jonathon C., MD, Cha, Stephen, MSc, Pajaro, Octavio E., MD, PhD, Steidley, David Eric, MD, Scott, Robert L., MD, PhD, Carvajal, Tomas, MD, Saadiq, Rayya A., DO, Srivathsan, Komandoor, MD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 15.08.2016; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Cardiac arrhythmia; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - methods; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Cardiomyopathy; Cardiovascular; Defibrillators; Defibrillators, Implantable; Electric Countershock; Female; Heart failure; Heart Failure - therapy; Heart-Assist Devices; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Patients; Tachycardia, Ventricular - epidemiology; Tachycardia, Ventricular - therapy; Transplants & implants; Ventricular Fibrillation - epidemiology; Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy
• ISSN: 0002-9149; 1879-1913
• DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.050

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces ventricular arrhythmia (VA) burden in some patients with heart failure, but its effect after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is unknown. We compared VA burden in patients with CRT devices in situ who underwent LVAD implantation and continued CRT (n = 39) to those who had CRT turned off before discharge (n = 26). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks were significantly reduced in patients with continued CRT (1.5 ± 2.7 shocks per patient vs 5.5 ± 9.3 with CRT off, p = 0.014). There was a nonsignificant reduction in cumulative VA episodes per patient with CRT continued at discharge (42 ± 105 VA per patient vs 82 ± 198 with CRT off, p = 0.29). On-treatment analysis by whether CRT was on or off identified a significantly lower burden of VA (17 ± 1 per patient-year CRT on vs 37 ± 1 per patient-year CRT off, p <0.0001) and ICD shocks (1.2 ± 0.3 per patient-year CRT on vs 1.7 ± 0.3 per patient-year CRT off, p = 0.018). In conclusion, continued CRT is associated with significantly reduced ICD shocks and VA burden after LVAD implantation.