Evaluation of selected properties of a new root repair cement containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer fillers

Objective This study evaluated selected properties of a prototype root repair cement containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer fillers (S-PRG) in comparison to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and intermediate restorative material (IRM). Materials and methods The antibacterial effect of S-PRG, MT...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical oral investigations Vol. 20; no. 8; pp. 2139 - 2148
Main Authors Yassen, Ghaeth H., Huang, Ruijie, Al-Zain, Afnan, Yoshida, Takamitsu, Gregory, Richard L., Platt, Jeffrey A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.11.2016
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective This study evaluated selected properties of a prototype root repair cement containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer fillers (S-PRG) in comparison to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and intermediate restorative material (IRM). Materials and methods The antibacterial effect of S-PRG, MTA, and IRM cements was tested against Porphyromonas gingivalis and Enterococcus faecalis after 1 and 3 days of aging of the cements. The set cements were immersed in distilled water for 4 h to 28 days, and ion-releasing ability was evaluated. Initial and final setting times of all cements were evaluated using Gilmore needles. The push-out bond strength between radicular dentin and all cements was tested at different levels of the roots. Results S-PRG and IRM cements, but not MTA cement, demonstrated significant antibacterial effect against P. gingivalis . All types of cements exhibited significant antibacterial effect against E. faecalis without being able to eliminate the bacterium. S-PRG cement provided continuous release of fluoride, strontium, boron, sodium, aluminum, and zinc throughout all tested time points. Both initial and final setting times were significantly shorter for S-PRG and IRM cements in comparison to MTA. The push-out bond strength was significantly lower for S-PRG cement in comparison to MTA and IRM at coronal and middle levels of the roots. Conclusions S-PRG cement demonstrated significant antibacterial effects against endodontic pathogens, multiple ion-releasing ability, relatively short setting time, and low bonding strength. Clinical relevance S-PRG cement can be used as a one-visit root repair material with promising antibacterial properties and ion-releasing capacity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1432-6981
1436-3771
DOI:10.1007/s00784-016-1715-5