Evaluation of selected properties of a new root repair cement containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer fillers
Objective This study evaluated selected properties of a prototype root repair cement containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer fillers (S-PRG) in comparison to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and intermediate restorative material (IRM). Materials and methods The antibacterial effect of S-PRG, MT...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical oral investigations Vol. 20; no. 8; pp. 2139 - 2148 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.11.2016
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective
This study evaluated selected properties of a prototype root repair cement containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer fillers (S-PRG) in comparison to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and intermediate restorative material (IRM).
Materials and methods
The antibacterial effect of S-PRG, MTA, and IRM cements was tested against
Porphyromonas gingivalis
and
Enterococcus faecalis
after 1 and 3 days of aging of the cements. The set cements were immersed in distilled water for 4 h to 28 days, and ion-releasing ability was evaluated. Initial and final setting times of all cements were evaluated using Gilmore needles. The push-out bond strength between radicular dentin and all cements was tested at different levels of the roots.
Results
S-PRG and IRM cements, but not MTA cement, demonstrated significant antibacterial effect against
P. gingivalis
. All types of cements exhibited significant antibacterial effect against
E. faecalis
without being able to eliminate the bacterium. S-PRG cement provided continuous release of fluoride, strontium, boron, sodium, aluminum, and zinc throughout all tested time points. Both initial and final setting times were significantly shorter for S-PRG and IRM cements in comparison to MTA. The push-out bond strength was significantly lower for S-PRG cement in comparison to MTA and IRM at coronal and middle levels of the roots.
Conclusions
S-PRG cement demonstrated significant antibacterial effects against endodontic pathogens, multiple ion-releasing ability, relatively short setting time, and low bonding strength.
Clinical relevance
S-PRG cement can be used as a one-visit root repair material with promising antibacterial properties and ion-releasing capacity. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1432-6981 1436-3771 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00784-016-1715-5 |