Dynamic heterogeneity as a strategy of stem cell self-renewal

To maintain cycling adult tissue in homeostasis the balance between proliferation and differentiation of stem cells needs to be precisely regulated. To investigate how stem cells achieve perfect self-renewal, emphasis has been placed on models in which stem cells progress sequentially through a one-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 113; no. 27; pp. 7509 - 7514
Main Authors Greulich, Philip, Simons, Benjamin D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 05.07.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To maintain cycling adult tissue in homeostasis the balance between proliferation and differentiation of stem cells needs to be precisely regulated. To investigate how stem cells achieve perfect self-renewal, emphasis has been placed on models in which stem cells progress sequentially through a one-way proliferative hierarchy. However, investigations of tissue regeneration have revealed a surprising degree of flexibility, with cells normally committed to differentiation able to recover stem cell competence following injury. Here, we investigate whether the reversible transfer of cells between states poised for proliferation or differentiation may provide a viable mechanism for a heterogeneous stem cell population to maintain homeostasis even under normal physiological conditions. By addressing the clonal dynamics, we show that such models of “dynamic heterogeneity” may be equally capable of describing the results of recent lineage tracing assays involving epithelial tissues. Moreover, together with competition for limited niche access, such models may provide a mechanism to render tissue homeostasis robust. In particular, in 2D epithelial layers, we show that the mechanism of dynamic heterogeneity avoids some pathological dependencies that undermine models based on a hierarchical stem/progenitor organization.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by Roeland Nusse, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, and approved May 9, 2016 (received for review February 23, 2016)
Author contributions: P.G. and B.D.S. designed research; P.G. performed research; P.G. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; and P.G. and B.D.S. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1602779113