Recognition of RNA by the S9.6 antibody creates pervasive artifacts when imaging RNA:DNA hybrids

• Published in: The Journal of cell biology Vol. 220; no. 6; p. 1
• Main Authors: Smolka, John A., Sanz, Lionel A., Hartono, Stella R., Chédin, Frédéric
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Rockefeller University Press 07.06.2021
• Subjects: Antibodies; Deoxyribonucleic acid; DNA; DNA biology; DNA sequencing; Double-stranded RNA; Gene mapping; Genetics; Genomes; Hybrids; Imaging; Immunofluorescence; Immunoprecipitation; Nuclease; Nucleoli; Pretreatment; Recognition; Ribonuclease H1; Ribonuclease T1; Ribonucleic acid; RNA; RNA biology; rRNA; Staining; Technology
• ISSN: 0021-9525; 1540-8140; 1540-8140
• DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202004079

The S9.6 antibody is broadly used to detect RNA:DNA hybrids but has significant affinity for double-stranded RNA. The impact of this off-target RNA binding activity has not been thoroughly investigated, especially in the context of immunofluorescence microscopy. We report that S9.6 immunofluorescence signal observed in fixed human cells arises predominantly from ribosomal RNA, not RNA:DNA hybrids. S9.6 staining was unchanged by pretreatment with the RNA:DNA hybrid–specific nuclease RNase H1, despite verification in situ that S9.6 recognized RNA:DNA hybrids and that RNase H1 was active. S9.6 staining was, however, significantly sensitive to RNase T1, which specifically degrades RNA. Additional imaging and biochemical data indicate that the prominent cytoplasmic and nucleolar S9.6 signal primarily derives from ribosomal RNA. Importantly, genome-wide maps obtained by DNA sequencing after S9.6-mediated DNA:RNA immunoprecipitation (DRIP) are RNase H1 sensitive and RNase T1 insensitive. Altogether, these data demonstrate that imaging using S9.6 is subject to pervasive artifacts without pretreatments and controls that mitigate its promiscuous recognition of cellular RNAs.