Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis

Abstract Background Staphylococcus lugdunensis belongs to the CoNS group, but is regarded to be more virulent than most other CoNS. It is also remarkably susceptible to antibiotics, including penicillin G. Objectives To evaluate different methods for penicillin susceptibility testing, to assess peni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of antimicrobial chemotherapy Vol. 75; no. 5; pp. 1206 - 1211
Main Authors Hagstrand Aldman, Malin, Påhlman, Lisa I
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.05.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Staphylococcus lugdunensis belongs to the CoNS group, but is regarded to be more virulent than most other CoNS. It is also remarkably susceptible to antibiotics, including penicillin G. Objectives To evaluate different methods for penicillin susceptibility testing, to assess penicillin susceptibility rates among S. lugdunensis and to describe the clinical presentation including antibiotic treatment. Methods Clinical isolates of S. lugdunensis were tested for penicillin susceptibility using disc diffusion according to CLSI (10 U disc) and EUCAST (1 U disc), assessment of zone-edge appearance, nitrocefin test and Etest for MIC determination. PCR of the blaZ gene was used as a reference method. Results Of the 112 isolates included in the study, 67% were susceptible to penicillin G according to blaZ PCR. The EUCAST disc diffusion test had 100% sensitivity, whereas the CLSI method had one very major error with a false-susceptible isolate. When zone-edge appearance was included in the assessment, the false-susceptible isolate was correctly classified as resistant. Foreign-body infection was the most common focus of infection, affecting 49% of the participants. Only 4% of the patients were treated with penicillin G. Conclusions Penicillin susceptibility is common in S. lugdunensis and the disc diffusion method according to EUCAST had a higher sensitivity than that of CLSI. Assessment of zone-edge appearance could increase the sensitivity of the disc diffusion test. Penicillin susceptibility testing and treatment should be considered in S. lugdunensis infections.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0305-7453
1460-2091
1460-2091
DOI:10.1093/jac/dkaa004