Investigation of mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between macitentan, a novel endothelin receptor antagonist, and sildenafil in healthy subjects

Aim To study the mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between macitentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, and sildenafil in healthy male subjects. Methods In this open‐label, randomized, three way crossover study, 12 healthy male subjects received the following oral treatments: A) a loading dose o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of clinical pharmacology Vol. 78; no. 5; pp. 1035 - 1042
Main Authors Sidharta, Patricia N., Giersbergen, Paul L. M., Wolzt, Michael, Dingemanse, Jasper
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BlackWell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim To study the mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between macitentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, and sildenafil in healthy male subjects. Methods In this open‐label, randomized, three way crossover study, 12 healthy male subjects received the following oral treatments: A) a loading dose of 30 mg macitentan on day 1 followed by 10 mg once daily for 3 days, B) sildenafil 20 mg three times a day for 3 days and a single 20 mg dose on day 4 and C) both treatments A and B concomitantly. Plasma concentration−time profiles of macitentan and its active metabolite ACT‐132577 (treatments A and C) and sildenafil and its N‐desmethyl metabolite (treatments B and C) were determined on day 4 and analyzed non‐compartmentally. Results The pharmacokinetics of macitentan were not affected by sildenafil. In the presence of sildenafil Cmax and AUCτ of the metabolite ACT‐132577 decreased with geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval (CI)) of 0.82 (0.76, 0.89) and 0.85 (90% CI 0.80, 0.91), respectively. In the presence of macitentan, plasma concentrations of sildenafil were higher than during treatment with sildenafil alone, resulting in increased Cmax and AUCτ values. The respective geometric mean ratios were 1.26 (90% CI 1.07, 1.48) and 1.15 (90% CI 0.94, 1.41). The pharmacokinetics of N‐desmethylsildenafil were not affected by macitentan. All treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion A minor, not clinically relevant, pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between macitentan and sildenafil. Based on these results, no dose adjustment of either compound appears necessary during concomitant treatment with macitentan and sildenafil.
ISSN:0306-5251
1365-2125
DOI:10.1111/bcp.12447