Lesion-by-lesion correlation between uptake at FDG PET and the Ki67 proliferation index in resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
Ki67 proliferation index and tumor uptake on 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emitting tomography (FDG-PET) could be correlated in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET), but the evaluation of the former is subject to tumor heterogeneity. Explore the correlation between Ki67 and FDG-PET uptake at th...
Saved in:
Published in | Digestive and liver disease Vol. 51; no. 12; pp. 1720 - 1724 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier Ltd
01.12.2019
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Ki67 proliferation index and tumor uptake on 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emitting tomography (FDG-PET) could be correlated in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET), but the evaluation of the former is subject to tumor heterogeneity.
Explore the correlation between Ki67 and FDG-PET uptake at the lesion scale in PanNET.
We identified target lesions ≥10 mm in patients operated on for a PanNET and/or associated metastases with preoperative FDG-PET and without neoadjuvant treatment. We assessed the lesion-by-lesion correlation between Ki67 and the tumor-to-liver SUVmax ratio (SUVmax T/L), and between pathological grade (G) and metabolic grade (mG) (mG1, SUVmax T/L ≤ 1, mG2, SUVmax T/L 1–2.3 and mG3, SUVmax T/L > 2.3).
Twenty-one patients underwent pancreatic (n = 12), liver (n = 2) or combined surgery (n = 7). Overall, 36 target lesions (21 primary PanNET, 13 liver metastases and 2 lymph-node metastases) were identified, of median Ki67 4%. Ki67 correlated with SUVmax T/L (r = 0.55, p < 0.001). Median SUVmax T/L was 0.76, 1.41 and 2.67 for lesions G1, G2 and G3, respectively (p = 0.005). Median Ki67 was 1, 4 and 25 for lesions mG1, mG2 and mG3, respectively (p = 0.005).
Uptake on FDG-PET could predict the pathological grade of PanNET lesions. Hence, FDG-PET could supplement pathological evaluation of tumor biological aggressiveness and could guide the choice of the most relevant lesions to biopsy. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1590-8658 1878-3562 1878-3562 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.dld.2019.06.022 |