Multifactorial probit analysis of mortality in burned patients

Burn mortality statistics may be misleading unless they account properly for the many factors which may influence outcome. In reviewing such factors in our patients, we identified age, total burn area, third degree burn area, prior bronchopulmonary disease, abnormal Pao2, and airway edema as the fac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of surgery Vol. 189; no. 1; pp. 1 - 5
Main Authors Zawacki, B E, Azen, S P, Imbus, S H, Chang, Y T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.01.1979
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Burn mortality statistics may be misleading unless they account properly for the many factors which may influence outcome. In reviewing such factors in our patients, we identified age, total burn area, third degree burn area, prior bronchopulmonary disease, abnormal Pao2, and airway edema as the factors present on admission which best distinguished survivors from nonsurvivors. Using multifactorial probit analysis, we then calculated the contribution of each to the probability of fatal outcome. The resultant six-factor model significantly improved estimation of the probability of fatal outcome when compared to probit analysis based only on the traditional factors of age and total burn area. It also revealed a spectrum of mortality probabilities varying with the additional factors present. Although crucial in comparing different approaches to burn care, consideration of such prognostic factors will not eliminate the need for randomized treatment trials, because other factors, some of which are obscure, may also influence mortality rates in burned patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-4932
1528-1140
DOI:10.1097/00000658-197901000-00001