A Fondazione Italiana Linfomi cohort study of R-COMP vs R-CHOP in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
•R-COMP is a curative option for older patients with DLBCL and intermediate- to high-risk EPI, even in the presence of a baseline cardiopathy.•R-CHOP is confirmed as the standard therapy for patients at low risk based on the EPI. [Display omitted] Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristin...
Saved in:
Published in | Blood advances Vol. 7; no. 15; pp. 4160 - 4169 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
08.08.2023
The American Society of Hematology |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •R-COMP is a curative option for older patients with DLBCL and intermediate- to high-risk EPI, even in the presence of a baseline cardiopathy.•R-CHOP is confirmed as the standard therapy for patients at low risk based on the EPI.
[Display omitted]
Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is the most commonly used regimen for the upfront treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, it is associated with cardiotoxicity, especially in older patients. Substituting doxorubicin with non-PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (R-COMP) may reduce the risk of cardiac events, but its efficacy has never been demonstrated in prospective trials. We describe the characteristics and outcome of patients with DLBCL aged ≥65 years prospectively enrolled in the Elderly Project by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi and treated with full doses of R-CHOP or R-COMP per local practice. Starting from 1163 patients, 383 (55%) were treated with R-CHOP and 308 (45%) with R-COMP. Patients treated with R-COMP were older (median age, 76 vs 71 years), less frequently fit at simplified geriatric assessment (61% vs 88%; P < .001), and had a more frequent baseline cardiac disorders (grade >1, 32% vs 8%; P < .001). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) was similar between R-CHOP and R-COMP (70% and 64%); 3-year overall survival was 77%, and 71% respectively. R-CHOP was associated with better PFS vs R-COMP only in the Elderly Prognostic Index (EPI) low-risk group. The two groups had similar rates of treatment interruptions due to toxicities or of cardiac events (P = 1.00). We suggest R-COMP is a potentially curative treatment for older patients with intermediate- or high-risk EPI, even in the presence of a baseline cardiopathy. R-CHOP is confirmed as the standard therapy for low risk patients. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2473-9529 2473-9537 |
DOI: | 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023009839 |