Understanding depressive rumination from a mood-as-input perspective: Effects of stop-rule manipulation

The current study tested the mood-as-input hypothesis account of perseverative rumination in 25 participants with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder and 25 healthy controls. It also examined the factors underlying mood changes within a bout of rumination and their relations with trait ruminati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehaviour research and therapy Vol. 51; no. 6; pp. 300 - 306
Main Authors Chan, Jason C.S., Davey, Graham C.L., Brewin, Chris R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2013
Elsevier
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The current study tested the mood-as-input hypothesis account of perseverative rumination in 25 participants with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder and 25 healthy controls. It also examined the factors underlying mood changes within a bout of rumination and their relations with trait rumination and metacognitive beliefs about rumination. A structured rumination interview was used to facilitate participants' reflection on two previous depressive incidents while deploying a specific stop-rule for the task (either a goal-guided or feeling-guided stop-rule). As predicted by the mood-as-input hypothesis, perseveration exhibited by depressed participants was affected by the interaction between diagnosis and stop-rule, with levels of perseveration being greatest when depressed participants used the goal-guided stop-rule. Increases in negative mood over the rumination interview were shown to be influenced only by participants' diagnostic status, regardless of their stop-rule. Compared to healthy controls, depressed participants also reported a preferential use of the goal-guided stop-rule in response to negative mood states in their daily lives. The findings about the dependence of rumination on stop-rule use within the depressed sample support the use of metacognitive treatment approaches in which patients are encouraged to challenge negative beliefs about the controllability of rumination. ► We tested how long depressed and healthy participants ruminate with different stop-rules. ► There were no group differences when participants used a feeling-guided stop-rule. ► The depressed only ruminated longer when using a goal-guided stop-rule. ► The depressed described a general preference for a goal-guided stop-rule. ► Manipulation of stop-rules may be an effective element of metacognitive therapy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0005-7967
1873-622X
DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2013.02.007