Prevalence and variability in reporting of clinically actionable incidental findings on attenuation-correction CT scans in a veteran population
Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) often employs attenuation-correction computed tomography (CTAC) to reduce attenuation artifacts and improve specificity. While there is no specific guideline on how they should be reported, incidental noncardiac findings identified on these scans may be clinically...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of nuclear cardiology Vol. 26; no. 5; pp. 1688 - 1693 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cham
Elsevier Inc
01.10.2019
Springer International Publishing Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) often employs attenuation-correction computed tomography (CTAC) to reduce attenuation artifacts and improve specificity. While there is no specific guideline on how they should be reported, incidental noncardiac findings identified on these scans may be clinically significant. The prevalence of these findings in veterans is not currently known. In addition, variability in reporting these findings may depend on the interpreting physician’s specialty.
To guide future decision-making, CTACs in veterans referred for MPI were prospectively evaluated in a quality-control project for a set of prespecified actionable incidental findings by cardiologists and a radiologist.
On the 771 scans performed over eight months, 285 incidental noncardiac findings were identified by the interpreting cardiologists and 378 were identified by the interpreting radiologist. Pulmonary nodules were the most common occurring in 20% of studies read by the radiologist. Interreader agreements between cardiologists and the radiologist were poor for pulmonary nodules ≥ 10 mm and hiatal hernias; fair for pulmonary nodules < 10 mm, extracardiac masses, and aortic aneurysms; and moderate for pleural plaques.
Incidental noncardiac findings on CTACs are common in our veteran population. Overall interobserver agreement in identifying these findings between cardiologists and radiologists is fair. Specific guidelines are needed on how CTACs should be read and reported. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1071-3581 1532-6551 1532-6551 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12350-018-1232-9 |