Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A on Persistent Myofascial Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This study assessed the safety and efficacy of three different doses of BoNT-A for persistent myofascial pain (MFP). One hundred female subjects were randomly assigned into five groups (n = 20): oral appliance (OA), saline solution (SS) and three BoNT-A groups with different doses. Pain intensity an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inToxins Vol. 12; no. 6; p. 395
Main Authors De la Torre Canales, Giancarlo, Alvarez-Pinzon, Natalia, Muñoz-Lora, Victor Ricardo Manuel, Vieira Peroni, Leonardo, Farias Gomes, Amanda, Sánchez-Ayala, Alfonso, Haiter-Neto, Francisco, Manfredini, Daniele, Rizzatti-Barbosa, Célia Marisa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 15.06.2020
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study assessed the safety and efficacy of three different doses of BoNT-A for persistent myofascial pain (MFP). One hundred female subjects were randomly assigned into five groups (n = 20): oral appliance (OA), saline solution (SS) and three BoNT-A groups with different doses. Pain intensity and pressure pain threshold were evaluated up to 24 weeks after treatment. Adverse effects related to muscle contraction, masticatory performance, muscle thickness and mandibular bone volume were also assessed. Changes over time were compared within and between groups. The “nparLD” package and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to analyze the data. BoNT-A reduced pain intensity (p < 0.0001) and increased pressure pain threshold (p < 0.0001) for up to 24 weeks compared to the placebo. No differences were found between BoNT-A and OA at the last follow-up. A transient decline in masticatory performance (p < 0.05) and muscle contraction (p < 0.0001), and a decrease in muscle thickness (p < 0.05) and coronoid and condylar process bone volume (p < 0.05) were found as dose-related adverse effects of BoNT-A. Regardless of the dose, BoNT-A was as effective as OA on MFP. Notwithstanding, due to BoNT-A dose-related adverse effects, we suggest the use of low doses of BoNT-A in MFP patients that do not benefit from conservative treatments.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:2072-6651
2072-6651
DOI:10.3390/toxins12060395