The challenges of an in situ validation of a nonequilibrium model of soil heat and moisture dynamics during fires

• Published in: Hydrology and earth system sciences Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 685 - 709
• Main Author: Massman, William J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 17.02.2021; Copernicus Publications
• Subjects: Analysis; Boundary conditions; Burning; Calibration; Corrections; Dynamic response; Energy balance; Equilibrium; Evaporation; Evaporation and condensation; Fires; Flow equations; Fluctuations; Forest & brush fires; Fuels; Heat conductivity; Heat flow; Heat flux; Heat transfer; Heat transmission; Heating; In situ temperature; Instruments; Measuring instruments; Natural resources; Parameterization; Physical properties; Physics; Prescribed fire; Risk reduction; Sensitivity analysis; Soil; Soil conservation; Soil dynamics; Soil heat flux; Soil moisture; Soil properties; Soil temperature; Stability; Surface energy; Surface energy balance; Surface properties; Temperature; Temperature dependence; Thermal conductivity; Vapor sources; Water vapor; Water vapour; Wildfires
• ISSN: 1607-7938; 1027-5606; 1607-7938
• DOI: 10.5194/hess-25-685-2021

With the increasing frequency and severity of fire, there is an increasing desire to better manage fuels and minimize, as much as possible, the impacts of fire on soils and other natural resources. Piling and/or burning slash is one method of managing fuels and reducing the risk and consequences of wildfire, but the repercussions to the soil, although very localized, can be significant and often irreversible. In an effort to provide a tool to better understand the impact of fire on soils, this study outlines the improvements to and the in situ validation of a nonequilibrium model for simulating the coupled interactions and transport of heat, moisture and water vapor during fires. Improvements to the model eliminate the following two important (but heretofore universally overlooked) inconsistencies: one that describes the relationship between evaporation and condensation in the parameterization of the nonequilibrium vapor source term, and the other that is the incorrect use of the apparent thermal conductivity in the soil heat flow equation. The first of these made a small enhancement in the stability and performance of the model. The second is an important improvement in the physics underpinning the model but had less of an impact on the model's performance and stability than the first. This study also (a) develops a general heating function that describes the energy input to the soil surface by the fire and (b) discusses the complexities and difficulties of formulating the upper boundary condition from a surface energy balance approach. The model validation uses (in situ temperature, soil moisture and heat flux) data obtained in a 2004 experimental slash pile burn. Important temperature-dependent corrections to the instruments used for measuring soil heat flux and moisture are also discussed and assessed. Despite any possible ambiguities in the calibration of the sensors or the simplicity of the parameterization of the surface heating function, the difficulties and complexities of formulating the upper boundary condition and the obvious complexities of the dynamic response of the soil's temperature and heat flux, the model produced at least a very credible, if not surprisingly good, simulation of the observed data. This study then continues with a discussion and sensitivity analysis of some important feedbacks (some of which are well known and others that are more hypothetical) that are not included in the present (or any extant) model, but that undoubtedly are dynamically influencing the physical properties of the soil in situ during the fire and, thereby, modulating the behavior of the soil temperature and moisture. This paper concludes with a list of possible future observational and modeling studies and how they would advance the research and findings discussed here.