Multiple Testing of Composite Null Hypotheses in Heteroscedastic Models
In large-scale studies, the true effect sizes often range continuously from zero to small to large, and are observed with heteroscedastic errors. In practical situations where the failure to reject small deviations from the null is inconsequential, specifying an indifference region (or forming compo...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 107; no. 498; pp. 673 - 687 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Alexandria
Taylor & Francis Group
01.06.2012
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In large-scale studies, the true effect sizes often range continuously from zero to small to large, and are observed with heteroscedastic errors. In practical situations where the failure to reject small deviations from the null is inconsequential, specifying an indifference region (or forming composite null hypotheses) can greatly reduce the number of unimportant discoveries in multiple testing. The heteroscedasticity issue poses new challenges for multiple testing with composite nulls. In particular, the conventional framework in multiple testing, which involves rescaling or standardization, is likely to distort the scientific question. We propose the concept of a composite null distribution for heteroscedastic models and develop an optimal testing procedure that minimizes the false nondiscovery rate, subject to a constraint on the false discovery rate. The proposed approach is different from conventional methods in that the effect size, statistical significance, and multiplicity issues are addressed integrally. The external information of heteroscedastic errors is incorporated for optimal simultaneous inference. The new features and advantages of our approach are demonstrated using both simulated and real data. The numerical studies demonstrate that our new procedure enjoys superior performance with greater accuracy and better interpretability of results. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2012.664505 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 1537-274X 0162-1459 1537-274X |
DOI: | 10.1080/01621459.2012.664505 |