Mandatory Menu Labeling in One Fast-Food Chain in King County, Washington

Background As part of a comprehensive effort to stem the rise in obesity, King County, Washington, enforced a mandatory menu-labeling regulation requiring all restaurant chains with 15 or more locations to disclose calorie information at the point of purchase beginning in January 2009. Purpose The p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of preventive medicine Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 122 - 127
Main Authors Finkelstein, Eric A., PhD, Strombotne, Kiersten L., BA, Chan, Nadine L., PhD, MPH, Krieger, James, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.02.2011
Subjects
Chains
Commerce - legislation & jurisprudence
Fast food service industry
Fast Foods
Humans
Internal Medicine
King county, Washington
Kings
Labels
Mandatory Programs
Nutrition
Product Labeling
Public health
Purchasing
Regulation
Takeaway food
Transactions
Washington
Washington
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background As part of a comprehensive effort to stem the rise in obesity, King County, Washington, enforced a mandatory menu-labeling regulation requiring all restaurant chains with 15 or more locations to disclose calorie information at the point of purchase beginning in January 2009. Purpose The purpose of this study is to quantify the impact of the King County regulation on transactions and purchasing behavior at one Mexican fast-food chain with locations within and adjacent to King County. Methods To examine the effect of the King County regulation, a difference-in-difference approach was used to compare total transactions and average calories per transaction between seven King County restaurants and seven control locations focusing on two time periods: one period immediately following the law until the posting of drive-through menu boards (January 2009 to July 2009) and a second period following the drive-through postings (August 2009 through January 2010). Analyses were conducted in 2010. Results No impact of the regulation on purchasing behavior was found. Trends in transactions and calories per transaction did not vary between control and intervention locations after the law was enacted. Conclusions In this setting, mandatory menu labeling did not promote healthier food-purchasing behavior.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0749-3797
1873-2607
DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.019