Dynamics of somatostatin 4 receptor expression during chronic-stress loading and its potential as a chronic-stress marker

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 14; no. 1; p. 10045
• Main Authors: Abe, Yuki, Murase, Takehiko, Mitsuma, Masahide, Shinba, Yoriko, Yamashita, Hiromi, Ikematsu, Kazuya
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 02.05.2024; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/337; 692/53; Animals; Biomarkers; Biomarkers - metabolism; Chronic Disease; Chronic stress; Gene expression; Humanities and Social Sciences; Lung - metabolism; Male; Mice; multidisciplinary; Pituitary; Pituitary Gland - metabolism; Receptors, Somatostatin - genetics; Receptors, Somatostatin - metabolism; Restraint stress; Restraint, Physical; RNA, Messenger - genetics; RNA, Messenger - metabolism; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Somatostatin; Somatostatin receptor subtype-4; Somatostatin receptors; Stress, Physiological; Stress, Psychological - metabolism; Thymus; Thymus gland; Thymus Gland - metabolism; Biomarkers; Chronic stress; Restraint stress; Thymus gland; Somatostatin receptor subtype-4
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58621-7

Chronic stress has been implicated in mental illnesses and depressive behaviors. Somatostatin 4 receptor (SSTR4) has been shown to mediate anxiolytic and depression-like effects. Here, we aimed to explore the potential of SSTR4 as a diagnostic marker for chronic stress in mice. The mice were divided into single stress, chronic restraint stress, and control groups, and Sstr4 mRNA expression in the pituitary, lungs, and thymus, its protein expression in the thymus, were analyzed. Compared to controls, Sstr4 mRNA expression decreased significantly in the pituitary gland of the chronic and single-stress groups (P = 0.0181 and 0.0022, respectively) and lungs of the single-stress group (P = 0.0124), whereas it significantly increased in the thymus of the chronic-stress group (P = 0.0313). Thymic SSTR4 expression did not decrease significantly in stress groups compared to that in the control group (P = 0.0963). These results suggest that SSTR4 expression fluctuates in response to stress. Furthermore, Sstr4 mRNA expression dynamics in each organ differed based on single or chronic restraint stress-loading periods. In conclusion, this study suggests that investigating SSTR4 expression in each organ could allow for its use as a stress marker to estimate the stress-loading period and aid in diagnosing chronic stress.