Laser‐Induced Keyhole Defect Dynamics during Metal Additive Manufacturing

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) metal additive manufacturing provides distinct advantages for aerospace and biomedical applications. However, widespread industrial adoption is limited by a lack of confidence in part properties driven by an incomplete understanding of how unique process parameters rel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAdvanced engineering materials Vol. 21; no. 10
Main Authors Kiss, Andrew M., Fong, Anthony Y., Calta, Nicholas P., Thampy, Vivek, Martin, Aiden A., Depond, Philip J., Wang, Jenny, Matthews, Manyalibo J., Ott, Ryan T., Tassone, Christopher J., Stone, Kevin H., Kramer, Matthew J., van Buuren, Anthony, Toney, Michael F., Nelson Weker, Johanna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons) 01.10.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) metal additive manufacturing provides distinct advantages for aerospace and biomedical applications. However, widespread industrial adoption is limited by a lack of confidence in part properties driven by an incomplete understanding of how unique process parameters relate to defect formation and ultimately mechanical properties. To address that gap, high‐speed X‐ray imaging is used to probe subsurface melt pool dynamics and void‐formation mechanisms inaccessible to other monitoring approaches. This technique directly observes the depth and dynamic behavior of the vapor depression, also known as the keyhole depression, which is formed by recoil pressure from laser‐driven metal vaporization. Also, vapor bubble formation and motion due to melt pool currents is observed, including instances of bubbles splitting before solidification into clusters of smaller voids while the material rapidly cools. Other phenomena include bubbles being formed from and then recaptured by the vapor depression, leaving no voids in the final part. Such events complicate attempts to identify defect formation using surface‐sensitive process‐monitoring tools. Finally, once the void defects form, they cannot be repaired by simple laser scans, without introducing new defects, thus emphasizing the importance of understanding processing parameters to develop robust defect‐mitigation strategies based on experimentally validated models. Void formation during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing is investigated using high‐speed X‐ray imaging. This nondestructive technique allows for imaging inside the component during the build process to visualize the highly dynamic vapor depression and capture void formation. Vapor depression depth and number of voids generated is measured to experimentally validate the theoretical keyholing threshold.
Bibliography:USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES) (SC-22)
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
AC02-07CH11358; AC02-76SF00515; SC0012704; AC52-07NA27344
ISSN:1438-1656
1527-2648
DOI:10.1002/adem.201900455