Characterization of HIV drug resistance mutations among patients failing first-line antiretroviral therapy from a tertiary referral center in Lusaka, Zambia

In settings of resource constraint, an understanding of HIV drug resistance can guide antiretroviral therapy (ART) at switch to second‐line therapy. To determine the prevalence of such HIV drug resistance mutations (HIV DRM), we used an in‐house sequencing assay in the pol gene (protease and partial...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical virology Vol. 87; no. 7; pp. 1149 - 1157
Main Authors Seu, Lillian, Mulenga, Lloyd B., Siwingwa, Mpanji, Sikazwe, Izukanji, Lambwe, Nason, Guffey, M. Bradford, Chi, Benjamin H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In settings of resource constraint, an understanding of HIV drug resistance can guide antiretroviral therapy (ART) at switch to second‐line therapy. To determine the prevalence of such HIV drug resistance mutations (HIV DRM), we used an in‐house sequencing assay in the pol gene (protease and partial reverse transcriptase) in a cohort of patients suspected of failing a first‐line regimen, which in Zambia comprises two nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and one non‐nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). Our analysis cohort (n = 68) was referred to the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka from November 2009 to October 2012. Median duration on first‐line ART to suspected treatment failure was 3.2 years (IQR 1.7–4.7 years). The majority of patients (95%) harbored HIV‐1 subtype C virus. Analysis of reverse transcriptase revealed M184V (88%), K103N/S (32%), and Y181C/I/V (41%) DRMs, with the latter conferring reduced susceptibility to the salvage therapy candidates etravirine and rilpivirine. Three patients (5%) had major protease inhibitor (PI) resistance mutations: all three had the V82A mutation, and one patient (Clade J virus) had a concurrent M46I, Q58E, and L76V DRM. HIV‐1 genotyping revealed major and minor DRMs as well as high levels of polymorphisms in subtype C isolates from patients failing first‐line antiretroviral therapy. Closer monitoring of DRM mutations at first‐line failure can inform clinicians about future options for salvage therapy. J. Med. Virol. 87:1149–1157, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JMV24162
ark:/67375/WNG-T9PV2G4M-N
NIH Fogarty International Center - No. R24 TW007988
University of Zambia - No. 1U2G GH000109-01
University Teaching Hospital - No. U2G GH000078
Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia - No. U2G GH000226
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
istex:C8A90433815256618C7B9162F816F009D5D96DB9
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0146-6615
1096-9071
DOI:10.1002/jmv.24162