Minimal acute toxicity from proton beam therapy for major salivary gland cancer
Introduction: Proton beam therapy (PBT) reduces normal organ dose compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with major salivary gland tumors. It is not known whether this dosimetric advantage is clinically meaningful for reducing acute toxicity. Methods: We evaluated trea...
Saved in:
Published in | Acta oncologica Vol. 59; no. 2; pp. 196 - 200 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Taylor & Francis
01.02.2020
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Introduction: Proton beam therapy (PBT) reduces normal organ dose compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with major salivary gland tumors. It is not known whether this dosimetric advantage is clinically meaningful for reducing acute toxicity.
Methods: We evaluated treatment parameters and acute toxicity outcomes of patients with major salivary gland cancers enrolled on the Proton Collaborative Group REG001-09 trial (NCT01255748).
Results: One-hundred and five patients with a median age of 61 years were included. The majority had parotid (N = 90) versus submandibular gland (N = 15) tumors. The patients were treated across seven institutions in the United States between 2010 and 2017, most commonly in the postoperative setting (70.5%) although a minority were treated definitively (29.5%). Median PBT dose was 66.5 GyE in 33 fractions; only one patient was prescribed less than 50 GyE. Chemotherapy was given concurrently to 20%. Median follow-up was 14.3 months. Acute grade 2 or higher toxicity included nausea (1.5%), dysgeusia (4.8%), xerostomia (7.6%), mucositis (10.5%) and dysphagia (10.5%).
Conclusions: PBT should be strongly considered when ipsilateral radiation therapy is indicated for major salivary gland cancer based on a considerably lower incidence of acute grade 2 or higher toxicity in this analysis compared to historical IMRT outcomes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0284-186X 1651-226X |
DOI: | 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1698764 |