Risk management for arsenic in agricultural soil–water systems: lessons learned from case studies in Europe

• Published in: Journal of hazardous materials Vol. 424; no. Pt D; p. 127677
• Main Authors: Loukola-Ruskeeniemi, Kirsti, Müller, Ingo, Reichel, Susan, Jones, Celia, Battaglia-Brunet, Fabienne, Elert, Mark, Le Guédard, Marina, Hatakka, Tarja, Hellal, Jennifer, Jordan, Isabel, Kaija, Juha, Keiski, Riitta L., Pinka, Jana, Tarvainen, Timo, Turkki, Auli, Turpeinen, Esa, Valkama, Hanna
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 15.02.2022; Elsevier
• Subjects: adsorbents; adsorption; Agricultural soil; agricultural soils; Arsenic; Arsenic - analysis; Arsenic - toxicity; Biotechnology; chronic exposure; Computer Science; ecotoxicology; France; Germany; Guidelines; Membrane technologies; Regulation; remediation; reverse osmosis; risk; Risk assessment; Risk Management; Soil; Soil Pollutants - analysis; Soil Pollutants - toxicity; soil water; spring barley; Surface water; Sustainability assessment; toxicity; Treatments; Water; France; Germany; Arsenic; Risk assessment; Surface water; Agricultural soil; Regulation; Membrane technologies; Treatments; Risk management; Sustainability assessment; Guidelines; risk assessment; soil; arsenic; water; agricultural land
• ISSN: 0304-3894; 1873-3336; 1873-3336
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127677

Chronic exposure to arsenic may be detrimental to health. We investigated the behaviour, remediation and risk management of arsenic in Freiberg, Germany, characterized by past mining activities, and near Verdun in France, where World War I ammunition was destroyed. The main results included: (1) pot experiments using a biologically synthesized adsorbent (sorpP) with spring barley reduced the mobility of arsenic, (2) the Omega-3 Index ecotoxicological tests verified that sorpP reduced the uptake and toxicity of arsenic in plants, (3) reverse osmosis membrane systems provided 99.5% removal efficiency of arsenic from surface water, (4) the sustainability assessment revealed that adsorption and coagulation–filtration processes were the most feasible options for the treatment of surface waters with significant arsenic concentrations, and (5) a model was developed for assessing health risk due to arsenic exposure. Risk management is the main option for extensive areas, while remediation options that directly treat the soil can only be considered in small areas subject to sensitive use. We recommend the risk management procedure developed in Germany for other parts of the world where both geogenic and anthropogenic arsenic is present in agricultural soil and water. Risk management measures have been successful both in Freiberg and in Verdun. [Display omitted] •Arsenic concentrations in agricultural topsoil are both geogenic and anthropogenic.•Soil remediation was successful with a biologically synthesized adsorbent sorpP.•Adsorption and coagulation-filtration methods were feasible for As-rich surface waters.•A health risk assessment model for As-rich agricultural sites was introduced.•A risk management procedure and guidelines were established for As-rich agricultural sites.